Journal of Innovative Agriculture, Volume 9, Issue 4 : 22-31. Doi :10.37446/jinagri/rsa/9.4.2022.22-31
Research Article

OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 31-Dec-2022

AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of yield of different wheat varieties under irrigated and moisture-restricted environments

  • Bishnu Bhusal
  • Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Kushal Bhattarai
  • Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Mukti Ram Poudel
  • Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Nav Raj Adhikari
  • Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Deepak Pandey
  • National Wheat Research Program (NWRP), Nepal Agriculture Research Council (NARC), Bhairahawa, Rupandehi, Nepal.


Wheat is an important winter cereal of Nepal but drought limits its production as 34.44% of wheat producing area is under non-irrigated environment. The identification of high yielding potential varieties with stable performance under drought environment may be the way forward to cope with limited productivity. So, in this study, the effect of genotype by environment interaction on yield of fourteen wheat varieties and two promising lines under two environmental conditions, irrigated and moisture-restricted environments were inspected. The research was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replication in each environment. The result showed significant difference between grain yield in irrigated and moisture restricted environments. In irrigated environment, highest yield was obtained in BL 4341 and lowest yield was obtained in Gautam while in moisture restricted environment, highest yield was obtained in NL 1327 and lowest yield was obtained in Nepal 297. In moisture-restricted environment, grain yield was reduced by 43.28% in comparison with irrigated environment. The AMMI analysis revealed that genotype, environment, genotype-environment interaction was highly significant for grain yield, and these explained 15.78%, 71.55%, 12.66% of the effect on yield, respectively. The which-won-where polygon view of GGE biplot revealed that BL 4341 and NL 1327 as vertex varieties and winning in irrigated and non-irrigated environment respectively. Furthermore, the mean-versus-stability pattern identified Bhrikuti as high yielding and stable variety while NL 1368 and Banganga were stable but produced below average yield. Similarly, from the ranking genotype pattern, we identified varieties Bhrikuti, BL 4341 and NL 971 to be close to the ideal variety respectively.


adaptability, AMMI, environment, genotype, stability, stress, wheat


  • Aadhar, S. & Mishra, V. (2019). A substantial rise in the area and population affected by dryness in South Asia under 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C and 2.5 °C warmer worlds. Environmental Research Letters, 14(11), 114021.

    Anwaar, H. A., Perveen, R., Mansha, M. Z., Abid, M., Sarwar, Z. M., Aatif, H. M., & Khan, K. A. (2020). Assessment of grain yield indices in response to drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 27(7), 1818–1823.

    K. C. Bishwas, Poudel, M. R., & Regmi, D. (2021). AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of yield of different elite wheat line under terminal heat stress and irrigated environments. Heliyon, 7(6), e07206.

    Bocianowski, J., Warzecha, T., Nowosad, K., & Bathelt, R. (2019). Genotype by environment interaction using AMMI model and estimation of additive and epistasis gene effects for 1000-kernel weight in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).  Journal of Applied Genetices, 60(2), 127–135.

    De Vita, P., Mastrangelo, A. M., Matteu, L., Mazzucotelli, E., Virzì, N., Palumbo, M., & Cattivelli, L. (2010). Genetic improvement effects on yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy. Field Crops Research, 119(1), 68–77.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). Online Statistical Database. Retrieved from

    Hagos, H. G., & Abay, F. (2013). AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of bread wheat genotypes in the northern part of Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1(1), 12–18.

    Hashim, N., Rafii, M. Y., Oladosu, Y., Ismail, M. R., Ramli, A., Arolu, F., & Chukwu, S. (2021). Integrating multivariate and univariate statistical models to investigate genotype–environment interaction of advanced fragrant rice genotypes under rainfed condition. Sustainability, 13(8), 4555.

    Hooshmandi, B. (2019). Evaluation of tolerance to drought stress in wheat genotypes. Idesia, 37(2), 37–43.

    Khan, M. M. H., Rafii, M. Y., Ramlee, S. I., Jusoh, M., & Al Mamun, M. (2021). AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability assessment of selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) genotypes under the multi-environmental trails (METs). Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–17.

    Kumar, A., Verulkar, S. B., Mandal, N. P., Variar, M., Shukla, V. D., Dwivedi, J. L., & Raman, A. (2012). High-yielding, drought-tolerant, stable rice genotypes for the shallow rainfed lowland drought-prone ecosystem. Field Crops Research, 133, 37–47.

    MOALD. 2022. Agriculture Diary. Retrieved from /2/2019/19794382/

    Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Zadhasan, E., Ahmadi, M. M., & Amri, A. (2018). The use of AMMI model for interpreting genotype × environment interaction in durum wheat. Experimental Agriculture, 54(5): 670–683.

    Nayava, J. L., Singh, R., & Bhatta, M. R. (2009). Impact of Climate, Climate Change and Modern Technology on Wheat Production in Nepal: A Case Study at Bhairahawa. Journal of Hydrology and Meterology, 6(1) 1–14.

    Niak, A., Wani, S. H., Rafiqee, S., Sofi, M., Sofi, N. R., Shikari, A. B., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Deciphering Genotype times Environment Interaction by AMMI and GGE Biplot Analysis Among Elite Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes of Himalayan Region. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and  Genetics, 8(1), 41–52.

    Oladosu, Y., Rafii, M. Y., Abdullah, N., Magaji, U., Miah, G., Hussin, G., & Ramli, A. (2017). Genotype × Environment interaction and stability analyses of yield and yield components of established and mutant rice genotypes tested in multiple locations in Malaysia*. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science, 67(7), 590–606.

    Pietragalla, J., Mullan, D.M., & Reynolds, M.P. (2012). Physiological Breeding II: A Field Guide to Wheat Phenotyping. CIMMYT.

    Poudel, M. R., Ghimire, S., Dhakal, K., Thapa, D. B., & Poudel, H. K. (2020). Yield Stability Analysis of Wheat Genotypes at Irrigated, Heat Stress and Drought Condition. Journal of Biology and  Today’s World, 9(4), 1–10.

    Rad, M. R. N., Kadir, M. A., Rafii, M. Y., Jaafar, H. Z. E., Naghavi, M. R., & Ahmadi, F. (2013). Genotype × environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under normal and drought stress conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7(7), 956–961.

    Shrestha, A. B., & Aryal, R. (2011). Climate change in Nepal and its impact on Himalayan glaciers. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1), 65–77.

    Singh, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, V., Kumar, P., Sendhil, R., Tyagi, B. S., & Singh, G. P. (2019). Genotype x environment interaction analysis of multi-environment wheat trials in India using AMMI and GGE biplot models. Crop Breeding Applied. Biotechnology, 19(3),  309–318.

     Tadesse, W., Amri, A., Ogbonnaya, F. C., Sanchez-Garcia, M., Sohail, Q., & Baum, M. (2016). Wheat. In Genetic and Genomic Resources for Grain Cereals Improvement (pp. 81-124). Academic Press.

    Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40(3), 597–605.

    Yan, W., & Kang, M. S. (2003). GGE Biplot Analysis. In CRC Press.


  • No.of Views (225)
  • PDF Downloads (73)